...... .............Larouche Online Almanac

Published: Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2005

Volume 4, Issue Number 39
*Sponsored and paid for by LaRouche PAC

This Week You Need To Know:


The Congress Must Tackle Hyperinflationary Blowout
by Jeffrey Steinberg

Whether they like it or not, whether they are ready to face the music or not, sometime very soon, the 535 men and women who make up the United States Senate and House of Representatives are going to be called upon to deal with the worst global financial and monetary shock collapse in modern times. Under the best of circumstances, such Senate-led action will occur under vastly improved conditions at the White House—the removal from office, by some combination of impeachment, resignation due to medical problems, or Republican Party patriotic intervention—of Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W. Bush.If the total financial and monetary meltdown occurs prior to that, as is far more likely, the burden on the Members of the Senate and House will be all that much greater.

Lyndon LaRouche noted frankly, in a Sept. 23 interview, that "this kind of emergency action, we must admit, is contrary to the inclinations of the Congress and most key Congressional advisors. But the survival of this nation and the majority of human beings on this planet depends on the willingness of at least some leaders of the Senate and the House to face this tough nut. Survival sometimes depends on the courageous action of a relatively small handful of individuals in leading positions."

LaRouche added, "The Greeks could not prevent the Peloponnesian War from erupting for the same reason that Members of Congress, at this time, refuse to consider the alternatives to disaster, even though the alternatives have been clearly spelled out. Throughout history, we have seen nations self-destruct because their leaders accepted prevailing moods, and refused to take the kinds of necessary steps to lead their people to safety."...
Complete article, PDF format

CURRENT SUBSCRIBERS:
LOG IN HERE, OR USE THE LINKS BELOW, TO ACCESS THIS ISSUE.

The Economy

World and Nation-State
Proposed Rail Development Corridors in the Indiana-Ohio-Pennsylvania Industrial Belt

Recent LaRouche Webcasts*

Emergency Webcast,
"Pulling This Nation Together Now!"
Sept. 3, 2005
"A New Bretton Woods: Time To Reverse George Shultz's Destruction of Exchange Controls"
April 7, 2005
*Sponsored by LaRouchePAC

This Week in History


September 27 - October 3, 1684

increase Mather Battles the British Crown To Save the New England Republics

On Oct. 3, 1684, King Charles II of England revoked the Massachusetts Charter on the grounds that the colony would not tolerate the Church of England, and refused to enforce England's Navigation Acts. The degenerate King and his nobles and bankers were determined to bring all the American colonies under a centralized authority, the better to loot them, and the well-organized republican citizens of Massachusetts and Connecticut were the main obstacle to their plans.

The assault had begun more quietly in 1664, when the new King had sent commissioners to New England who were charged with "insinuating yourselves by all kind and dextrous carriage into the good opinion of the principal persons there, that so you may lead and dispose them to renew their Charters and to make such alterations as will appear necessary for their own benefit." The original charter of Massachusetts Bay had granted the settlers the right to govern their affairs in America, and not be subject to directives from London. Thus, the king at first was careful not to directly confront New England's independent status.

King Charles told his commissioners that their objective was "the general disposing that people to an entire submission and obedience to our government which is their own greatest security in respect of their neighbors and leading them to a desire to renew their Charters." This was indeed a difficult mission, since the Americans knew that the Royal Government had clandestinely encouraged the Indians to attack the settlers, and did nothing to defend them.

The objective of subjugating New England was so important that all looting had to be suspended for the moment, lest the sheer rapacity of the Royal minions alarm the colonists. "All designs of profit for the present seem unreasonable," said Charles, "and may possibly obstruct the more necessary design upon their obedience and loyalty." He continued that to the "sort of people which will be active in many projects for our profit and benefit, you must not be forwards too much, since most overtures of that kind are but airy imaginations, and cannot be put in practice by our own immediate power and authority, without manifest violation of their Charter."

By 1675, Charles had set up a new Privy Council committee which was called the Lords of Trade and Plantations, which would enforce the necessary looting policies. A Royal emissary, Edward Randolph, was sent to negotiate with the New Englanders. Randolph was also appointed as Collector of Customs, clearly demonstrating what his actual function was intended to be. He was rebuffed by the Massachusetts Bay Council, who treated him like a foreigner meddling in domestic affairs, and when Randolph demanded that Governor John Leverett answer the King's letter with all convenient speed, Leverett replied by asking "by what Order I made that demand." Randolph returned to London in high dudgeon and lobbied the Lords of Trade and Plantation for harsher measures against New England.

By 1682, the Crown brought a "quo warranto" against Massachusetts "for usurping to be a body Politick." When Randolph returned to Boston with the King's declaration, a Puritan minister named Increase Mather stepped to the forefront of the opposition to Royal rule. He issued a pamphlet entitled "Arguments against relinquishing the Charter," which was given to all the members of the General Court, (the Massachusetts Legislature) and also distributed to the general population. In it, Mather said that Massachusetts would "act neither the part of Good Christians nor of True Englishmen, if by any act of theirs they should be accessory to the Plot then managing to produce a General Shipwreck of Liberties."

King Charles finally revoked the Massachusetts charter in 1684, but died the following February. When his brother and successor, King James II, appointed Joseph Dudley as "President" of the Dominion of New England, Increase Mather and his allies continued to resist. Two years later, Mather was appointed President of Harvard College, and he and his republican circles succeeded in filling many offices under the new government. Edward Randolph, seeing that New England was still determined to resist Royal rule, now denounced Royal appointee Dudley as "a man of base servile, and anti-monarchical principle."

The monarchy's solution was to reveal the iron fist which wore the velvet glove — it appointed the despised Sir Edmund Andros to bring New England to heel. It was Andros who, as former Royal Governor of New York, had tried to conquer half of Connecticut and attach it to New York. Andros was also the son of the man who had driven Increase Mather from his post as chaplain on the Isle of Guernsey when Charles II came to power.

Andros soon eliminated the Massachusetts town meeting, except for one ceremonial meeting a year. The republican system of law was overturned by ending the printing of statutes and putting the colony under the arbitrary will of the Crown. Under these repressive conditions, Increase Mather was secretly delegated to travel to London to plead the case of Massachusetts with the King. Word of this mission leaked out, and Edward Randolph had Mather arrested, but the jury let him go. Randolph tried again, but this time Mather, wearing a white cape, slipped by the Royal sentry watching his house and boarded a ship in Plymouth Harbor to sail for England.

Mather spent four years in England, from 1688 to 1692, and his initiatives on multiple fronts helped to develop a further basis for the future United States. He began negotiations with King James II on the Massachusetts charter the day after he arrived, for Mather was regarded as a person of consequence, and the king agreed to see him immediately. But within months, James was deposed by William of Orange, who invaded England with 15,000 Dutch troops in the so-called "Glorious Revolution." James was allowed to escape to France because he was the father of William's wife, Mary. The fact that Mary was next in line for the throne provided the rationale for William to be named King.

Mather worked with many in England who were favorable to the rights of the colonists. One of these was William Penn, whose colony of Pennsylvania would one day be the home of Mather's protégé Benjamin Franklin. Another was the Scottish Countess of Sutherland, a favorite of Queen Mary, who enabled Mather to speak directly to the Queen and ask for her help. Twenty years later, republican leader Jonathan Swift would obtain help for both England and the American colonies from Mary's younger sister, the future Queen Anne.

Although the rapacious and degenerate "Venetian Party" supported King William, the king was still too uncertain on his illegally-obtained throne to dismiss the support of the colonies. He met directly with Mather, and agreed to Mather's list of persons who should be appointed to Royal offices in Massachusetts. Although there was no way to avoid a charter which made Massachusetts a Royal Colony, Mather conducted a massive pamphlet campaign in England which argued for a large amount of self-rule. He succeeded in having the new charter guarantee the existence of the General Court, elected by the people and their representatives, and with the sole power to tax. The Royal Governor could use no funds except by the consent of the delegates.

But the new charter was only one of Mather's accomplishments in England. Writing of the year 1683 in Massachusetts, Mather said that "I promoted a design for a private philosophical society in Boston, which I hope may have laid the foundation for that which will be for future edification." His son Cotton called it "a Philosophical Society of Agreeable Gentlemen, who met once a Fortnight for a Conference upon Improvements in Philosophy and Additions to the Stores of Natural History." The society corresponded with scientists in Europe, including the English Royal Society, the French Academy of Science, Dutch scientists, and the circles of Gottfried Leibniz in Leipsig. It provided one of the models for Franklin's American Philosophical Society.

Full article on separate page...

Hear
The LaRouche Show
Saturdays
3pm, Eastern Time
2000-2100 UTC
(live and archived)

What Did LaRouche Say,
and When Did He Say It?
Visit the Audio-Visual Archive Page.*

*Paid for by LaRouche in 2004

Latest From LaRouche

LaRouche Briefs Media:
Government Can Control Today's Hyperinflation

This is an excerpt from an interview given by Lyndon LaRouche to talk show host Jeff Rense of Genesis Communications Network, on the evening of Sept. 21.

Rense: What are your latest observations on the scene in our nation's capital?

LaRouche: Well, I think you have now got a rate of inflation, which is hyperinflationary. We're in a world situation which is like Germany in 1923. And you just look at the rate at which prices are rising, and you realize that this is not going to go on too much longer. We're near the end of the game...

Complete Article, PDF format

InDepth Coverage

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Links to articles from
Executive Intelligence Review,
Vol. 32, No. 38
*Requires Adobe Reader®.


Feature:

Hyperinflation as a shockwave. Click for a high-resolution pdf version.

Hyperinflationary Patterns: Inflation Runs Wild
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

The world is presently gripped by a hyperinflationary wave-front of a Riemannian type. The situation is already comparable, at its primary-commodities 'spear point,' to Germany during the second half of 1923, with the other categories, such as consumer prices generally, on the way to being driven to overtake the effects seen currently in the domain of primary commodities being led, as a pack, by wildeyed petroleum-price speculation.

LaRouche Briefs Media
Government Can Control Today's Hyperinflation

This is an excerpt from an interview given by Lyndon LaRouche to talk show host Jeff Rense of Genesis Communications Network, on the evening of Sept. 21.
Rense: What are your latest observations on the scene in our nation's capital?
LaRouche: Well, I think you have nowgot a rate of inflation, which is hyperinflationary. We're in a world situation which is like Germany in 1923. And you just look at the rate at which prices are rising, and you realize that this is not going to go on too much longer. We're near the end of the game.

LaRouche PAC Testimony
Put a Lid on Prices; Re-Regulate Energy

This testimony was presented by Marcia Merry Baker of the LaRouche Political Action Committee, for the record, at the hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Sept. 21, on energy pricing.


LaRouche Webcast:

LaRouche's Dialogue With The Senate Continues
In last week's EIR,we published Lyndon LaRouche's opening remarks to a Sept. 16 webcast in Washington, D.C., on the theme of 'Revolutionary Transformation After Hurricane Katrina,' and the first question from the audience, which was on how the U.S. Senate should proceed to rebuild after the hurricane. Here, we continue with the dialogue, which was moderated by LaRouche's spokeswoman, Debra Hanania Freeman. The video of the webcast and a transcript are available at www.larouchepac.com.


Economics:

In a 'New TVA,' Housing May Be the Biggest Project Needed
by Paul Gallagher

A million Americans among those displaced from their homes by Hurricane Katrina, currently have no homes to return to in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama—the nation's highest poverty states, in which both the value of the homes destroyed, and the household income and wealth of those who lost them, were very far below what the overheated U.S. housing bubble has been demanding for new homes. The Gulf Coast region could become relatively depopulated, its poorer evacuees driven to relocate elsewhere and stranded for years in 'temporary housing,' unless there is a large, and rapid, Federal-state investment in the 'resettlement' of those Americans in their home states. The investment must be made—and it could be the largest single demand of a 'Marshall Plan' or 'New TVA' for the Gulf states.

Gulf Coast Ports and Rail Must Be Rebuilt
by Mary Jane Freeman

Sixteen days before Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast states, Mississippi's Port of Gulfport announced that it had set an annual tonnage-shipped record in 2005, thus securing its position as the '3rd busiest container port' on the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Then Katrina hit on Aug. 29, and five days later, on Sept. 3, the port's executive director Don Allee sent an e-mail: 'We took a direct hit. . . . Our east pier facilities have basically been gutted. Total loss of dry cargo facilities ([for] forest products, aluminum, paper). [They] are nowhere to be found.' He found port materials strewn three to four miles away in the next town.

Interview: Michael Parker
'We've Had 40 Years of Total Disregard For the Future—And We're Paying for It'

Michael Parker has been a five-term U.S. Representative from Mississippi, 1989-99; and served as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) from October 2001 until March 2002. President George W. Bush asked Parker to resign as Army Corps chief because of Parker's public criticism of significant cuts Bush was making to the Army Corps budget for economic infrastructure. Parker was interviewed on Sept. 21 by Richard Freeman, about the disastrous impact of Hurricane Katrina on infrastructure, and the principles for reconstruction.

Interview: Gary P. LaGrange
'Category 5 Levees Should Have Been Built'

Gary P. LaGrange, a New Orleans native, has been Executive Director and CEO of the Port of New Orleans since 2001. Previously, he was the Executive Director of the Mississippi State Port Authority at Gulfport from 1999-2001, and of the Port of South Louisiana in 1997. In each of these positions, he initiated state-of-the-art capital improvement projects, upgrading these Gulf Coast ports. LaGrange was interviewed by Mary Jane Freeman on Sept. 14.

How the Netherlands Prepared for A 10,000-Year Disastrous Flood
by Richard Freeman and Nina Ogden

In February 1953, a powerful storm surge from the North Sea created a disaster in the southwest provinces of Zeeland, principally, and South Holland, secondarily, in the Netherlands. There were 1,835 people killed, and 70,000 evacuated; 10,000 head of livestock drowned, and 4,500 buildings were destroyed. Within three weeks, a commission was functioning, which formulated a far-ranging plan for flood protection. The Netherlands government acted boldly and decisively to implement this plan, known as the Delta Works, during the next decades.
(For more on the Dutch Project, go to: www.keringhuis.nl/engels/home_noflash.html)

Credit: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Netherlands

National:

The Congress Must Tackle Hyperinflationary Blowout
by Jeffrey Steinberg

Whether they like it or not, whether they are ready to face the music or not, sometime very soon, the 535 men and women who make up the United States Senate and House of Representatives are going to be called upon to deal with the worst global financial and monetary shock collapse in modern times. Under the best of circumstances, such Senate-led action will occur under vastly improved conditions at the White House—the removal from office, by some combination of impeachment, resignation due to medical problems, or Republican Party patriotic intervention—of Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W. Bush. If the total financial and monetary meltdown occurs prior to that, as is far more likely, the burden on the Members of the Senate and House will be all that much greater.

Why LaRouche Opposes The Roberts Nomination
On the eve of the Sept. 22 Senate Judiciary Committee vote on President Bush's nomination of John Roberts for Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Lyndon LaRouche declared that Roberts was unqualified for the job, because he opposes the fundamental principle of the general welfare, which is enshrined in the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution.

How To End 'The Wrong War at the Wrong Time'
by Michele Steinberg

'The Iraq adventure was the wrong war, at the wrong time, waged with extraordinary incompetence by the civilian leadership. . . . Success as defined by our civilian leadership three years ago is out of reach,' stated Gen. Joseph P. Hoar (USMC, ret.), the former head of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), at an 'informal,' bipartisan Congressional hearing called on Sept. 15 by Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), on defining an exit strategy from Iraq.

  • 'Speak Out' and Restore Life to Our Democracy
    On Sept. 12, extraordinary commentary was given by two of Washington's most accomplished diplomats in the Arab and Islamic world, Hon. Charles Freeman, the former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and Dr. John Duke Anthony, president andCEOof the National Council of U.S.-Arab Relations, who spoke at the closing panel of 14th annual conference of the Council, entitled 'Restoring Arab-U.S. Trust in a Time of Turbulence and Reforms.' Both speakers spelled out a time of tragedy for the United States, in which the present Administration has failed the American people abroad, with its adventurous policies, and at home, as demonstrated by the devastation of the Gulf Coast by Hurricane Katrina.
  • Documentation
    We Pay More for Young People To Die, Than To Live

    The following exchange between Rep. Charlie Rangel (DN. Y.), who served in the Korean War, and former Sen. Max Cleland (D-Ga.), who served in the Vietnam War, occurred during the Sept. 15 hearing convened by Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.) on finding an exit strategy for Iraq.

International:

GERMAN ELECTION
Upset for Neo-Con Merkel; Increase for LaRouche Vote
by Rainer Apel
German neo-cons received a big shock when the Sept. 18 election for national parliament did not give them the expected mandate for forming the new government. With only 35.2% of the vote, the opposition Christian Democrats (CDU) of neo-con candidate for Chancellor, Angela Merkel, came in well below the 40-42% they had envisaged. Even if the 9.8% of the Free Democrats (FDP), Merkel's preferred choice as coalition partner, were added—a 'black-yellow' coalition (black for CDU, yellow for FDP)—this would only bring the total up to 45%of the vote, and would not enable her to deliver the 'regime change' which the Bush-leaning Merkel wanted.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche
We Must Have an All-Out Dresden Election Effort

Civil Rights Movement Solidarity (BüSo) National Chairwoman Helga Zepp-LaRouche issued the following statement Sept. 19, calling for an all-out mobilization by the Bu¨So to win the Dresden-I district part of the Sept. 18 national parliamentary election, which had to be postponed to Oct. 2.

Profile: Roman Herzog
When Might Makes Right: A New Legal Philosophy
by Elke Fimmen

Elke Fimmen is chairman of the Civil Rights Movement Solidarity party (BüSo) for Bavaria. This article appeared first in the weekly Neue Solidarita¨t on Sept. 14, prior to the Sept. 18 Federal election.

Documentation: North Korea
Joint Statement From Six-Way Nuclear Talks

These are excerpts from the text of a joint statement issued after the six-nation talks on North Korea's nuclear-weapons program on Sept. 19. The full statement appeared in Yonhap News of Beijing.

Law vs. Brute Force: The Fight Over Iran's Nuclear Program
by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach

Leading figures in the U.S. Administration, and among its international allies, have been priming an international crisis as a pretext for military action in Iran—the war plan of Vice President Dick Cheney. The immediate focus of U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and newly appointed Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, is to have the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) refer the issue of Iran's nuclear program to the UN Security Council.


EIR DVD

LaRouche: `The Immortality of Martin Luther King'

Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

speaks to the Martin Luther King Day Prayer Breakfast in Talladega County, Alabama on Jan. 19, 2004

$25

Order Online

or call 1-888-EIR-3258 (toll-free)

Hear
The LaRouche Show
Saturdays
3pm, Eastern Time
2000-2100 UTC
(live and archived)

Do you wish to change your account information?

"Our Purpose is to organize people to contribute, intellectually and otherwise, to the organizing of a mass-based movement—a Gideon's Army, but with mass-base potential and actual support—to mobilize the members of Gideon's Army to study, to read, to think, to consult together, to organize together, to try to reach out and influence broader and broader layers of the population."
Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Advertisement:

Coverup Exposed!

The Israeli Attack On the USS Liberty

``The Loss of Liberty,"
a video by filmmaker Tito Howard, proves beyond any doubt that the June 8, 1967 Israeli attack against the USS Liberty, in which 34 American servicemen were killed and 171 wounded, was deliberate. The video includes testimony from Liberty survivors, many Congressional Medal of Honor winners, and from such high-ranking Americans as:

  • Adm. Thomas H. Moorer,
  • Adm. Arleigh Burke
  • Gen. Ray Davis
  • Secretary of State Dean Rusk.

Plus — a new interview with James Bamford, author of ``Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency.''

$25, plus $2.95 shipping and handling

53 minutes, EIRSV-2003-1

Order from EIR News Service at 1-888-347-3258 (toll-free).

Or write P.O. Box 17390, Washington, D.C.
20041-0390.

Or contact the Webmaster:
eironline@larouchepub.com

Visa and MasterCard accepted.


All rights reserved © 2005 EIRNS

Subscribe to EIR Online

For all questions regarding your subscription to EIW, or questions or comments regarding the EIW website's contents or design, please contact eironline@larouchepub.com.

Phone: 1-888-EIR-3258