|This article appears in the January 14, 2000 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
Hyde-Bound Racism and the Constitution
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
January 6, 2000
Whether or not the evidence claiming Rep. Henry Hyde's (R-Ill.) long record
of alleged adultery, proves true, or not, that same Henry Hyde is to be fairly
described as "an immoral bastard" in much larger matters, including the matter
of law as such.
Our nation has come into an immoral, concupiscent time, when
the Nero-like editorial policy of Playboy's Hugh Hefner and the debate
over the morality, or immorality, of degenerates such as Newt Gingrich, Henry
Hyde, and Al Gore, does not reach beyond the province of the bedroom. In wider
areas, beyond those domains of relatively petty, proven or merely alleged
bedroom offenses, all sorts of major offenses, by even the same self-righteous
perpetrators, against both man and God, were tolerated by Hyde, and that with a
great show of cheerful indifference. The same spirit has been shown, even among
putative leaders of the Democratic National Committee, by racist creatures of
sundry patronages. One would suspect, from popular toleration for Representative
Hyde's antics against President William J. Clinton, that a wild-eyed lynch-mob
of rabid pornographers had taken over the nation.
All of the relevant developments were paraded before the
nation's mass-media in the matter of the attempted impeachment of a U.S.
President, all in the name of events and allegedly democratic decisions
occurring within the tiniest microcosms of personal discretion. Notably, the
sordid conduct of Representative Hyde and his factitious accomplices in this
affair, was premised upon their passionately avowed wish to effect a British
parliamentary coup d'état, not only against a sitting U.S. President, but
against the Constitution of our beloved United States.
Take in evidence the implicit racism of Henry Hyde. Hyde,
addressing the Senate, in the case of H.R.H. Prince Philip, and Philip's
conspiratorial and subversive organization Transparency International, vs.
President Clinton, made much ado about "the rule of law." Hyde's expressed
opinion on that occasion, was, and remains closely related, axiomatically, to
the racist philosophy of the misbegotten Confederate States of America. In this
matter, Hyde laid great emphasis upon the precedent of the so-called Magna
Carta. That emphasis is a rope fit to effect the political hanging of Henry
Hyde, on the grounds of grievous offenses against the most elementary principles
of Christian morality considered in the large.
On this account, please recognize that the argument of the
Democratic Party's current National Committee bureaucracy, and of both attorney
John Keeney and Federal Judge Sentelle, that the National Democratic Committee
is "a private club," is not only proven to have been a pre-1965 tradition of the
rabidly racist, Woodrow Wilson current within the Texas, and certain other parts
of the national Democratic Party. Indeed, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, was
established as enforceable law, with the clearly expressed intent of President
Lyndon Johnson and the U.S. Congress, to repudiate the odiousness of that racist
tradition of treating state and national political parties as private clubs for
the purpose of conduct of voters' selection of candidates for office.
The "private club" doctrine, is, beyond reasonable dispute,
an integral part of the tradition of racism in America. It is also, as
Representative Hyde insisted before the U.S. Senate, an expression, then and
now, of the purely heathen racism inhering in the tradition of the English Magna
Carta, the tradition invoked by alleged adulterer Henry Hyde for the failed
attempt at impeachment, on Hyde's allegations of adultery, foisted upon the
Congress of the U.S.A., against President Clinton. Put to one side the morbid
Romanticism of mythologist Sir Walter Scott; look at the Magna Carta for the
bestialist offense against man and God which it represented, in the time of
England's King John, and now.
In A.D. 1066, the Norman predators, bearing the tradition of
imperial Roman law, invaded, conquered, and ravished the Christian population of
Anglo-Saxon-Celtic England. These Normans, whose occupation savaged France, up
till the Fifteenth-Century accession of France's King Louis XI, brought many
evils upon Europe as a whole, including the conquest and looting of Sicily, the
so-called Hundred Years War, and the so-called Wars of the Roses in England
itself. From the time of the great reformers, the Waibling (Hohenstaufen)
Emperors of Europe, from the time of the Norman predator class's imposition of
the evil Magna Carta on England, the Romantic tyranny of the Norman barons and
their like, was the greatest curse internal to European civilization as a whole.
Indeed, the Wars of the Roses, were the inevitable outcome of the imposition and
perpetuation of the system of baronial jungle law imposed upon the British Isles
and Norman-dominated France combined.
That brutish, irrationalist, Norman tradition, is what
Representative Hyde, praised, with his bare face hanging out, before the
Senate's impeachment trial against President Clinton.
Today, the tradition of the Norman predatory barons is
faithfully served still, by those forces within the U.S. political parties, the
Congress, and the Federal Court, who have massacred the U.S. Constitution in
their avowed devotion to that legacy of baronial outlawry termed "shareholder
value." This was also the reading of John Locke, on which London's puppet, the
Confederate States of America, premised its alleged constitution. This perverted
notion of law, under which all sorts of crimes are licensed, in and out of the
bedroom, is not only the mother of racism in the U.S.A.; it is the whore which
breeds all varieties of evil genetically kindred to racism.
Such matters of law, should be seen clearly, so that we may
be rid of evils of the like of Henry Hyde's out-of-bedroom