TIME FOR HIM TO GO
LaRouche PAC Exposes
Obama's Role as the 'New Osama'
by Nancy Spannaus and Jeffrey Steinberg
Dec. 11—Three months after the terrorist murder of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other American personnel in Benghazi, the President of the United States has still provided no explanation for how such an event could have been permitted to occur. The failure to respond to requests for upgraded security, the failure to intervene militarily during the seven-hour battle surrounding the compound, and the record of lies about the nature of the attack, have all been heavily documented, but no one—except the four victims—has paid the price.
On Dec. 7, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, announced that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had agreed to testify before his Committee, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, before the end of the current Congressional session. It is also reported that the long-awaited report of the Accountability Review Board should be released this week. Should the truth be told, the evidence would show that Barack Obama, UN Ambassador Susan Rice, and probably numerous others, should be removed from office immediately, for having carried out policies, and shown criminal negligence, that resulted in these acts of war against the United States.
Even worse, the de facto alliance which the Obama Administration has had with the British and Saudis, and their terrorist favorites, is continuing, leading the United States, and the world, directly toward a confrontation with Russia and China that portends World War III (see International lead). Obama's behavior makes him a clear and present danger to the security of the United States, and thus liable for immediate impeachment.
To this end, the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee has issued a new fact sheet in the form of a mass leaflet, to alert the public to the heretofore hidden links between the Obama Administration and al-Qaeda.
Caught in the Act?
The Obama Administration has not been able to hide all its connections with al-Qaeda, particularly in its campaign to topple the government of Syria. Increasingly, it has become obvious that President Assad is correct (as Qaddafi was, as well) in his charge that the West is working with the terrorist al-Qaeda in its regime-change drive.
One of the major al-Qaeda-linked groups which has been widely identified is the Jabhat al-Nusra, a group which, according to the New York Times profile published Dec. 9, was formed by Iraqi and Syrian members of al-Qaeda in Iraq, who waged war against American occupation forces in Iraq, and have since crossed the border into Syria to join in the drive to oust the Assad government from power. Al-Nusra has frequently claimed credit for the most horrific suicide bombings and massacres of Syrian soldiers. They receive substantial financial support from the traditional conduits for British-spawned Islamic terrorism in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
Today, the Obama Administration decided to cut its losses, and declare Jabhat al-Nusra a terrorist group, putting it on the terrorist list, confiscating its assets in the U.S., and allegedly cutting all ties. While EIR knows that certain circles in the military-intelligence community pushed hard for this action, the war-mongers in the Administration want to use action against al-Nusra as a fig leaf, and declare that it is not working with terrorists, when it decides to recognize the rebel government recently set up by the British-Saudi alliance.
This basically amounts to a public relations job—especially since the jihadis move among various grouplets with ease. Al-Qaeda itself functions as a network of small cells, which can hardly be defined by a chart of organization. U.S. support for the insurgency, as long as the British, through their puppet Obama, are in charge, is intended to continue—albeit through other channels.
The task thus falls to those patriots who are prepared to tell the truth about the British-Saudi-Obama alliance, and remove Obama from office.