Executive Intelligence Review
Subscribe to EIR


LaRouche: British Global War Drive
Is Behind Nazi Onslaught in Ukraine

Feb. 22, 2014 (EIRNS)—In response to a question on his strategic assessment of the Ukraine crisis, at his Feb. 21 webcast, Lyndon LaRouche elaborated at length on both the global strategic nature of the problem, and the solution. The full answer, and webcast, can be found at www.larouchepac.com. We provide an edited version here.

"Well, the first thing you have to do is to find in what context are we talking? Now in the context in general is the fact that there is an intention on the part of the British Empire, and the British Empire is the orchestrator of all of these things.

"For example, the Nazi elements which are still there in Ukraine, the ones who were really stirring up all the violence in the first place, and do all the damage that was done there. These people are simply agents of the British, because what happened was, at the end of World War II, when the Nazis were being taken down to Nuremberg for trials, a certain part of the Nazi organization was never given that treatment.

"And this was the Ukrainian element which was part of the Hitler Nazi system, and continued in some of the most vicious crimes against humanity, not only among Ukrainians and others, but a very large penalty against the Polish people, who suffered greatly from this part of this Ukrainian element which wore Nazi insignia. It officially wore Nazi insignia in committing crimes; not war crimes, it was worse than war crimes. It was genocide. So what was done to the Jewish population, still over through these Nazis who were Ukrainian in their apparent qualifications.

"So therefore, how did these Nazis survive as Nazis? How was it they weren't taken to Nuremberg? They were among the worst mass killers. Why weren't they taken to Nuremberg since they were part of the Nazi system? Well, well, Churchill's England saved them; they covered up for them, and kept them in storage for rainy days. So therefore, when you're talking about Ukrainians — hey, wait a minute, you're not on the agenda. These Ukrainians are not Ukrainians; they're British assets. They're part of the SS operation of Hitler which was continued under British protection. So, they're British agents!

"All right, now what's the war about? Well, the British are in there. The war is about what? It's two areas: the trans-Atlantic region on the one side, the northern trans-Atlantic in particular. On the other side, the Eurasian side—which means Russia, China, India, and Korea and so forth and so on. So, the war that they're planning on, the issue of global war, is a war of what? Between the trans-Atlantic region and the Eurasian region. So, when you're talking about thermonuclear war, and this is what the subject is, that's what you're talking about.

"So now, if you want to talk about this, you have to put it in context. What's the war about? It's not about a local thing in some part of central Europe; it's a global war. So what are the global factors and how do these factors play in creating this situation?

"Now, the negotiations are a mess. However, there are reasons, human reasons largely, why you will put up with this mess. And you will try to see if you can solve the problem in that region; in other words, you want to minimize the damage. So therefore, it is correct to try to negotiate. It is correct even to go to great lengths to try to negotiate, but that is not going to solve the problem.

The one thing that will solve this problem — and it will solve it very quickly — I have a date of March 1st, and the date of March 1st is the date on which Obama is thrown out of office. The removal of that dictator, and I'm qualifying, he is a dictator. He went into this new year saying that he is no longer going to legislate, he's going to dictate. Now what's that? What does that say about our Constitution? That he's a dictator! And he's a killer. Now, Hitler was a dictator and a killer. The Queen of England is also a dictator over an empire, and a killer. Well, maybe we ought to rid of the killers, the mass killers.

And the point of the fact of the matter is, you've got 70% to 77% of the U.S. citizens hate Obama. Now why is he still President? If 77% of the adult voters hate Obama, why is he still President? The answer is obvious.

What we have to do in the case of this situation in Ukraine, we have to do what we can to try to stabilize the region to try to minimize the damage. Don't try to win the war; try to minimize the damage. Bring it under control by minimizing the damage. Now we've got to after the real enemy. The real enemy is partly Obama. Obama is a Nazi in every respect. He's cancelled human rights, he's cancelled the Constitution — he's repeatedly violated it. We have about 20 members of Congress already who realize that he's got to be thrown out. Well that's a good start, if we can get a running start. ...

Throw Obama Out of Office

"So therefore, what we're going to do is, we're going to say, if we pull Obama out of this process, we leave the Queen with nothing. She's unfortunately—I hate to say this—naked! The speculation is terrible! I don't want to look at this woman; she's awful! I mean, she's got an awful soul; and if you look at her, you're going to see her soul peeking out and you're going to say this is the worst thing you ever saw. She's pure evil. But you have to understand this thing: the Zeus issue against Prometheus.

"What this represents is, think about what we're really talking about. Stop the dog and pony shows. What are we talking about? Now the people of the United Kingdom are not all evil people. They are like our Americans; they're frightened chickens. And therefore, they bow and kowtow and so forth; they try to get by. They try not to offend the powers that be; they try to duck the blows from the powers that be. Well, I don't. I don't do foolish things, but I do some things that the enemy thinks are foolish; or hopes that are foolish. So therefore, I'm playing the role of strategist on a global level, because I'm free to voice what I know. And I also know that I know what I know; it's not a question of my opinion — I know.

"And when I say that March 1st is a plausible date for having Obama thrown out of office, I know what I'm talking about. That doesn't mean I can predict that March 1st is going to be the date; but I can say that what you have to do when you're shooting ducks, you have to aim at one duck. If you aim at the flock, you may miss all of them; aim at one duck.

"In other words, eliminate one factor; get one thing done. In getting Obama out of office, when he's violated the Constitution, he's a criminal; he's an international criminal. Eliminate the criminal! Ship him off; give him back to the Queen! Ship him back to her; let her feed him! Why should Americans have to feed this creature? She created him; or maybe Valerie Jarrett did, between one of her gyrations between Iran and London. This may have been, who knows? When you're talking about her, you don't know what you're getting into, and you don't want to know what you're getting into.

"But in any case, so therefore, throw Obama out of office. What's the grounds? The evidence is there; he's tried to set up a Hitler dictatorship. That's what he is; we've got to get him out of office. How do we do it? We've got a Constitution. The Constitution says you don't do that; you are bounced. And when we bounce you, that does mean we just impeach you. That means you are held after being impeached, for the crimes you have committed. In other words, when a President is kicked out of office, he may be just be kicked out of office. And a compromise being made, let him go; as long as he's gone and we're rid of him, let him go. But in a case like Obama, because of the international ties he has, we'd like to have him just go, but maybe that wouldn't work. Maybe we just have to try him.

Deal with Wall Street

"Now the complications come in relation to Wall Street. The great detonator of danger to every part of the world today is typified by Wall Street. Now Wall Street is actually, historically, is British; it is not American. Because what happened is, you had a war in the 17th and 18th Centuries. It was a war of the Dutch against what were still the English. And when the Dutch moved in and crushed the English system — and that was a mess, too — when they came through, they took over the last phase of that 17th Century. They also were key in crushing the Massachusetts Bay Colony. And they crushed it so badly that it couldn't revive on its own, so you had the key surviving leader sent — guess what? Benjamin Franklin, the printer, and sent him down to Rhode Island and then to Pennsylvania. And he turned out to be one of the greatest geniuses of the century; and he was connected to all of the great geniuses of the century at the same time.

"So therefore, what we have to realize is, that we have to create our system of government again. It's been destroyed. And therefore, you have Wall Street. Wall Street is a British institution; it has committed more mass murder against Americans and others than any other single phenomenon. Wall Street is the most evil enemy of mankind I know. Therefore, the Wall Street have to got — also, we have a practical problem. What we have to do is, we have to foreclose with Glass-Steagall. Now, under the Constitution — and I'm an expert on the Constitution, particularly on the work of Alexander Hamilton.

"What we have to do is, we have to get back to the original Constitutional system which Hamilton actually designed in four statements on government, principle of government. And this was the basis for the success of the U.S. institutions as the United States...."