Gauss' Declaration of Independence
by Bruce Director
In September 1798, after three years of selfdirected study, Carl Fredrich Gauss, then 21 years old, left Goettingen University without a diploma and returned to his native city of Brunswick to begin the composition of his Disquisitiones Arithmeticae. Lacking any prospect of employment, Gauss hoped to continue receiving his student stipend, without any assurance that his patron, Carl Wilhelm Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick, would oblige. After several months of living on credit, word came from the Duke that the stipend would continue, provided Gauss obtained his doctor of philosophy degree, a task Gauss thought a distraction and wished to postpone.
Nevertheless, he took the opportunity to produce a virtual declaration of independence from the stifling world of deductive mathematics, in the form of a written thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Helmstedt, on a new proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra. Within months he was granted his doctorate without even being required to appear for oral examination.
Describing his intention to his former classmate, Wolfgang Bolyai, Gauss wrote:
"The title indicates quite definitely the purpose of the essay; only about a third of the whole, nevertheless, is used for this purpose, the remainder contains chiefly the history and a critique of works on the same subject by other mathematicians (viz. d'Alembert, Bougainville, Euler, de Foncenex, Lagrange, and the encyclopedists ... which latter, however, will probably not be much pleased) besides many and varied comments on the shallowness which is so dominant in our presentday mathematics."
In essence, Gauss was defending, and extending, a principle, that goes back to Plato, in which only physical action, not arbitrary assumptions, defines our notion of magnitude. Like Plato, Gauss recognized it were insufficient to simply state his discovery, unless it were combined with a polemical attack on the Aristotelean falsehoods that had become so popular among his contemporaries.
Looking back on his dissertation 50 years later, Gauss said:
"The demonstration is presented using expressions borrowed from the geometry of position, for in this way, the greatest acuity and simplicity is obtained. Fundamentally, the essential content of the entire argument belongs to a higher domain, independent from space, (i.e. antiEuclideanbmd) in which abstract general concepts of magnitudes, are investigated as combinations of magnitudes connected by continuity, a domain, which, at present, is poorly developed, and in which one cannot move without the use of language borrowed from spatial images."
It is the intention of this essay to provide a summary sketch of the history of this conception, and Gauss' development of it. It can not be exhaustive. Rather it seeks to outline the steps which should form the basis for the extended oral pedagogical dialogues, that are already underway in various locations.
MultiplyExtended Magnitude
A physical concept of magnitude was already fully developed by those circles associated with Plato, expressed most explicitly in the Meno, Theatetus and the Timaeus dialogues. Plato and his circle demonstrated this concept, pedagogically, through the paradoxes that arise when considering the uniqueness of the five regular solids, and the related problems of doubling a line, square and cube. As Plato emphasized, each species of action, generated a different species of magnitude. He denoted such magnitudes by the Greek term, "dunamais", a term akin to Leibniz' use of the word "kraft", translated into English as "power". That is, a linear magnitude has the "power" to double a line, while only a magnitude of a different species has the "power" to double the square, and a still different species has the "power" to double a cube. In Riemann's language, these magnitudes are called, respectively, simply, doubly, and triply extended. Plato's circle emphasized that magnitudes of lesser extension lacked the capacity to generate magnitudes of higher extension, creating, conceptually, a succession of "higher powers". (See Figures 1(a), 1(b), 1(c).)
Do not think here of the deductive use of the term "dimension". While a perfectly good word, "dimension" in modern usage too often is associated with the Kantian idea of formal Euclidean space, in which space is considered as a combination of three independent simplyextended dimensions. Think instead of "physical extension". A line is produced by a physical action of simpleextension. A surface may be bounded by lines, but it is not made from lines, rather, a surface is irreducibly doublyextended. Similarly, a volume may be bounded by surfaces, which in turn are bounded by lines, but, it is irreducibly triplyextended. Thus, a unit line, square or cube, may all be characterized by the number One, but each One, is a species of a different power.
Plato's circle also emphasized, that this succession of magnitudes of higher powers were generated by a succession of different types of action. Specifically, a simplyextended magnitude was produced from linear action, doublyextended magnitudes from circular action, and triplyextended magnitudes from extendedcircular action, exemplified by that action which produces a cone, cylinder or torus. This is presented, pedagogically, by Plato in the Meno, with respect to doublyextended magnitudes, and the Timaeus with respect to the uniqueness of the five regular solids, and the problem of doubling the cube. For example, Plato's collaborator , Archytus, demonstrated that the magnitude associated with doubling of the cube, was not generated by circular action, but from extended circular action, i.e. conic sections. (See Figures 2(a), 2(b).)
It fell to Apollonius of Perga (262200 B.C.) to present a full exposition of the generation of magnitudes of higher powers in his work on Conics. His approach was to exhaustively investigate the generation of doubly and triply extended magnitudes, which he distinguished into plane (circle/line) and solid (ellipse, parabola, hyperbola) loci.
As Abraham Gotthelf Kaestner indicates in his 1795, History of Mathematics, the investigation of the relationships among higher powers, gave rise, to what became known by the Arabic word, algebra, and, from Leibniz on, as analysis. Here, the relationship of magnitudes of the second power (squares) and the third power (cubes) were investigated in the form of quadratic and cubic algebraic equations, respectively, while equations of higher degree took on a formal significance, but lacked the physical connection of quadratics and cubics.
Girolamo Cardan (15011576), and later, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (16461716), showed, there was a "hole" in all forms of algebraic equations, as indicated by the appearance of the square roots of negative numbers as solutions to such equations. Peering into this "hole", Leibniz recognized that algebra could teach nothing about the physics, but, that a general physical principle underlay all algebraic equations, of whatever power. Writing to Christaan Huyghens around 1673, on the square roots of negative numbers, Leibniz said he invented a machine which produced exactly the required physical action:
"It seems that after this instrument, there is almost nothing more to be desired for the use which algebra can or will be able to have in mechanics and in practice. It is believable that this was the aim of the geometry of the ancients (at least that of Apollonius) and the purpose of loci that he had introduced, because he had recognized that a few lines determine instantly, what long calculations in numbers could achieve only after long work capable of discouraging the most firm."
While finding the physical action that generated a succession of higher powers, Leibniz left open the question of what physical action produced the square roots of negative numbers.
Gauss' Proof
By the time Gauss left Goettingen, he had already developed a concept of the physical reality of the square roots of negative numbers, which he called, complex numbers. Adopting the method of Plato's cave metaphor, Gauss understood his complex numbers to be shadows reflecting a complex of physical action, (action acting on action). This complex action reflected a power greater than the triplyextended action that characterizes the manifold of visible space. It was Gauss' unique contribution, to devise a metaphor, from which to represent these higher forms of physical action, so those actions could be represented, by their reflections, in the visible domain.
In his 1799 dissertation, Gauss brilliantly chose to develop his metaphor, polemically, on the most vulnerable flank of his enemies algebraic equations. Like Leibniz, Gauss rejected the deductive approach of investigating algebraic equations on their own terms, insisting that it was physical action that determined the characteristics of the equations.
A simple example will help illustrate the point. Think of the physical meaning of the equation x^{2} = 4. Obviously, "x" refers to a side of a square whose area is 4. Thus, 2 is a solution to this equation. Now, think of the physical meaning of the equation x^{2} =  4. From a formal deductive standpoint, this equation refers to the side of a square whose area is  4. But, how can a square have an area of  4? Formally, the second equation can be solved by introducing the number 2\/1, or 2 i, which when squared equals  4. But, the question remains, what is the physical meaning of \/1? One answer is to say that \/1 has no physical meaning, and thus the equation x^{2} =  4 has no solution. To this, Euler and Lagrange added the sophistry, richly ridiculed by Gauss in his dissertation, that the equation x^{2} =  4 has a solution, but the solution is impossible!
Gauss demonstrated the physical meaning of the \/1, not in the visible domain of squares, but in the cognitive domain, of the principle of squaring.
This can be illustrated pedagogically, by drawing a square whose area we'll call 1. Then draw the diagonal of that square, and draw a new square using that diagonal as a side. The area of the new square will be 2. Now, repeat this action, again to generate a square whose area is 4. (See Figure 3.)
What is the principle of squaring so illustrated? The action that generated the magnitude which produced the square whose area is 2, was a rotation of 45 degrees and an extension of length from 1 to the \/ 2. To produce the square whose area is 4, that rotation of 45 degrees was doubled to 90 degrees, and the extension was squared to become 2. Repeat this process several times, to illustrate that the principle of squaring, can be thought of as the combined physical action of doubling a rotation and squaring the length. The square root is simply the reverse action. That is, halving the angle of rotation and decreasing the length by the square root.
Now draw a circle and a diameter, and apply this physical action of squaring to every point on the circle. That is, take every point on the circumference of the circle. Draw the radius connecting that point to the center of the circle. That radius makes an angle with the diameter you drew. To "square" that point, double the angle between the radius and the diameter, and square the length. Repeat this action with several points. Soon you will be able to see that the points on the first circle all map to points on another concentric circle, whose radius is the square of the original circle. But, it gets curiouser and curiouser. Since you doubled the angle each time you squared a point, the original circle will map to the "squared" circle twice! (See Figure 4.)
There is a physical example that illustrates this process. Take a bar magnet and rotate a compass around the magnet. As the compass moves from the north to south pole of the magnet, it will make one complete revolution. As it moves from the south pole back to the north, the compass will make another complete revolution. In effect, the bar magnet "squares" the compass! (See Figure 5.)
Gauss associated his complex numbers with this type of compound physical action, (rotation combined with extension), and made them visible, metaphorically, as spiral action projected onto a surface. Every point on that surface represents a complex number. Each number denotes a unique combination of rotation and extension. The point of origin of the action ultimately refers to a physical singularity, such as the lowest point of the catenary, or the poles of the rotating Earth, or the center of the bar magnet.
In the above example, the original circle becomes a unit circle in the complex domain. The center of the circle is the origin, denoted by 0, the ends of the diameter are denoted by 1 and 1. The \/1 is found by halving the rotation between 1 and 1 and reducing the radius by the square root. Think carefully, and you will see that \/1 and \/1 are represented by the points on the circumference which are halfway between 1 and 1. (See Figure 6.)
Gauss demonstrated that all algebraic powers, of any degree, when projected onto his complex domain, could be represented by an action similar to that just demonstrated for squaring. For example, the action of cubing a complex number is accomplished by tripling the angle of rotation and cubing the length. This maps the original circle three times onto a circle whose radius is the cube of the original circle. The action associated with the biquadratic power (fourth degree) involves quadrupling the angle of rotation and squaring the square of the length. This will map the original circle 4 times onto a circle whose radius is increased by the square of the square, and so forth for the all higher powers.
Thus, even though the manifolds of action associated with these higher powers exist outside the triplyextended manifold of visible space, the characteristic of action which produced them, was brought into view, by Gauss, in his complex domain.
